Patti Smith Mailing List archives
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: from the village voice (pc)
- To: babel-list
- Subject: Re: from the village voice (pc)
- From: "sonic5" <sonic5>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 19:35:39 -0500
- In-reply-to: <002d01c2197b$b733eae0$d053c718>
- Reply-to: sonic5
- Sender: owner-babel-list
On 21 Jun 2002, at 19:30, anthony_r wrote:
>
> I believe you were criticized by sonic5 awhile ago for seeming to
> support the idea that killing innocent civilians is somehow justified,
> which of course you weren't saying anything of the sort,
Wow, I'm flattered to be remembered. But for the record, I questioned
a post that was unclear (as did a few others). Dlofdahl answered my
question and I thanked him. (and my question came from a similar
situation - Dlofdahl posted an article [or excerpt from an article as
I recall ] with no comment. So I had no idea what he/she was trying
to convey. Without some comment how am I to know if the poster
agrees/disagrees with the source they've quoted?)
The reason I hate seeing politics brought up here is not because I
think its unacceptable subject matter per se, but because its never a
discussion, but rather a monologue, and very often a diatribe - and
ultimately a slug-fest of sorts, with folks feeling the need to
personally disparage anyone who disagrees. (as above. I mean, why
exactly was it necessary to attach a value judgment like
"criticized" when mentioning a past question of mine? Indeed the
whole sentence is written so as to make me appear "wrong.")
And certainly that's not restricted to this list. It happens almost
every mailing list and usenet group I read. Online forums tend to
become PR vehicles for folks who want to convert the world. I
appreciate the passion, but, speaking only for myself, lectures
rarely convince me to do anything except have flashbacks of my
parents.
I do however appreciate being directed to specific sources so that I
can make up my own mind. And I thank those of you who have included
links to such sources.
I speak only for myself when I say, just because I may choose not to
reveal my position on some things or because I question certain
posts, it doesn't necessarily mean I disagree with you. But if I do
disagree, please recognize that I have come to my opinion with as
much research and thought as led you to your view. And I would like
the same respect as you request.
s5